Chemical Constituents and Uses of Calotropis Procera and Calotropis Gigantea – A Review (Part I – The Plants as Material and Energy Resources)
Mazen A. M. Al Sulaibi1, 2, Carolin Thiemann1, Thies Thiemann1, *
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2020
First Page: 1
Last Page: 15
Publisher Id: CHEM-7-1
Article History:Received Date: 13/01/2020
Revision Received Date: 27/02/2020
Acceptance Date: 01/03/2020
Electronic publication date: 17/04/2020
Collection year: 2020
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The traditional and current use of Calotropis procera and C. gigantea, two soft-wooded, xerophytic shrubs of the family Apocynaceae, are reviewed against the background of the plants' chemical constituents and their biological properties. The focus is on the usage of the plants for building materials, natural pesticides, animal feed and bioremediative purposes.
Plants growing in arid regions have elicited increased attention, because the hostile environment, in which these plants survive, forces them to develop chemical protective systems rarely found in vegetation of other ecosystems. Furthermore, many of the plants grow in areas, where the dependence on traditional, plant-based medicines over industrially produced pharmaceuticals persists to this day. The two plants, Calotopris procera (giant milkweed, also named C. persica) and Calotropis gigantea (crown flower), have been used widely in traditional medicine in North Africa, the Middle East, and South and South-East Asia. This has led to extensive research on the chemical constituents of the plants. Both plants are known to be sources of cardenolides, and newer research has yielded a number of interesting cancer-active constituents. In addition, extracts of both plants have remarkable nematocidal, molluscidal and insecticidal activities. In many regions, the wood of Calotropis plants has been used as a building material and as a source of fuel. In addition, certain parts of the plants have been used as feed for livestock. In other regions, Calotropis plants are seen as invasive species that threaten local plant life and that due to their toxicity also pose a threat to grazing field animals. The complexity of the plants’ properties and chemical constituents combined with the wide geographic distribution and regional use of C. procera and C. gigantea has led to a fast-growing body of research on the two plants. For C. gigantea alone, approximately 120 research ent-
ries have appeared in 2006 (Australian New Crop Website), while in 2018, the database Web of Knowledge listed 55 research papers for C. procera and 30 research papers for C. gigantea. Short reviews on the two plants have appeared previously [1-9]. Two more comprehensive reviews have been given on ethnopharmaceutical aspects of C. gigantea [10, 11]. The current review provides a comprehensive, up-to-date picture of the uses and chemical constituents of both plants. The review comes in two parts, where the current part focuses on the usage of the plants for building materials, natural pesticides, animal feed and bioremediative purposes.
1.1. Geographic Distribution and Habitat
Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. and Calotropis gigantea R. Br. are two species of soft-wooded, evergreen, perennial shrubs of the family Apocynaceae, and subfamily Asclepiadoideae (milkweeds). Traditionally, the two plants have developed in two separate regions of the world, one, C. procera, predominately in Africa and in the Middle East, the other, C. gigantea, in Asia. Due to rapid expansion, often with human help, today they share some of the same habitats in the same regions.
C. gigantea is native to much of South Asia, such as to Iran, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka and India, and much of South East Asia such as to Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Indonesia, China, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. C. gigantea has been introduced to many of the Pacific Islands, including the Hawaiian Islands and New Guinea, whereas in some areas, such as in Palau  and on the Solomon Islands , it has been brought under cultivation. Also, in northern Australia, it has been introduced and cultivated. In the Americas, it has also been brought under cultivation in Barbados  and has established itself in Cuba  as well as in Brazil, where it is said to be an aggressive invader of the Caatinga ecoregion . With Indian immigrants, C. gigantea has also been introduced to Africa, including the Seychelles and Mauritius.
As a native plant, C. procera is found in many parts of tropical Africa, including Madagascar and in far south as Angola, in arid zones of Northern Africa and the Middle East. It has spread to South Asia and South-Eastern Asia. It has been introduced into parts of South America [6, 17] and Australia, where it is considered to be an undesirable weed. Also, it now occurs on the Caribbean and Hawaiian Islands, in Central America, South Africa as well as on the Spanish Canary Islands. In the Philippines, it has been reported as a relative new-comer. C. procera is relatively salt-tolerant, although the reduced dry mass of the plant is associated with the salinity of the soil [18, 19], and grows well on degraded lands. The rootstock has been reported to be resistant against fires  and temporary flooding. Both plants thrive in an arid environment , and C. procera can be seen at the edge of the desert in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (see Fig. 1). In the UAE, it has been estimated that on desert land dominated by C. procera, about 0.66 tons of soil organic carbon (SOC) per hectar is sequestered annually . In Mauretania, C. procera has been used in sand encroachment management, as it was found to be the first species to colonize sand dunes . In the Indian subcontinent, C. procera has been seen at up to 1000 m elevation . As the propagation of Calotropis plants is aided by human activity , it has been used as an indicator of man-induced historical perturbation of the environment . It is also an indication of overgrazing in many areas.
|Fig. (1). Photo of a Calotropis procera bush in Al Ain, UAE, showing the size to which C. procera can grow.|
1.2. General Description
C. gigantea can grow to 4 m high, while C. procera is usually smaller, although in the Al Ain area in the United Arab Emirates, the plants can also grow up to 4.5 m in height (Fig. 1). The stem can be up to 25 cm in diameter . The opposite leaves of C. procera are large, up to 18 cm and up to 13 cm broad. Leaves of C. gigantea are up to 10 cm long and 8 cm wide . C. procera has a profusion of five-petaled, sweet-smelling white flowers, 3.8 to 5.1 cm in size, with a marked purple tip. The equally five-petaled flowers of C. gigantea are white to lavender in color, and in contrast to those of C. procera, without fragrance. The grey-green fruits of C. procera are 8 – 12 cm long, containing 350-500 seeds with tufts of white, silky hair. Similarly, C. gigantea exhibits single or paired fruits, 7-10 cm long, with a profusion of white tufted, brown seeds, 2.5 – 3.5 cm in length . The seeds of both plants are distributed by wind and water, but also by birds when the ripe pods burst. Flowering takes place all through the year. The plants propagate through suckering as well. Thus, crowns and roots form suckers, where also broken stems can take root and regenerate. Pollination happens through insects, mostly through bees or butterflies.
1.3. Historical Use of the Calotropis
The name “Calotropis” stems from Greek with the meaning of “beautiful boat keel”. Historically, Calotropis has been of economic interest as many parts of the plant are usable. It is a sacred plant to many Hindi, associated with the observances of the maruts (winds), demigods of the rigvedic god Rudra. In the Arabian world, Calotropis was associated with sun-worship in ancient times, and also in Vedic times, the leaves of Calotropis, in form of arkapattra (sun-leaf) or arkaparna (lightning leaf), have been associated with sun-worship.
The Roman Jewish historian Titus Flavius Josephus (37-c.100) mentioned C. procera as the apple of Sodom. As such it is listed in the Mishnah and the Talmud. Abu Hanifa Dinawari (815-896) included Calotropis in his Book of Plants . Also, Ibn Sina (980-1037) has made note of the plant. In Renaissance Europe, the plant has been described by Prosper Alpinus (1553 – 1617) (De Plant. Aegpyti, Venet, 1592, Ch. XXV). Prosper Alpinus had studied the plant in Egypt (1580-1584) [31-33].
However, human interaction with the plant dates back to much earlier times. Thus, charcoal remains of C. procera have been found at archaeological sites associated with pre-dynastic settlements in the Nile Valley of Upper Egypt , although C. procera was not a predominant source of firewood in early Egypt . Nevertheless, an increase in the abundance of C. procera with an increase of human agricultural activity has been noted . Interestingly, in much later times, charcoal derived from Calotropis was utilized in gun powder, especially in Indo-China .
In some early civilizations, C. procera fibers served in textile making, such as in Cyprus in 2000 BC . According to Kramer, the fibers from the inner bark were used in the manufacture of cloth for princes and nobles. Later, Calotropis was used to make string and cord in Oman , and in Borneo, seed hairs of the plant were made into threads. In India, the fibers have been called the bow-strings of India and have been used for rug and net-making as well as for sewing threads.
Always, the flowers of the plant have served decorative purposes. This continues to this day, even in countries where Calotropis has been introduced only recently, such as in Hawaii, where the flowers of C. gigantea are included in garlands (leis), and in the Philippines, where the flowers are used to decorate rosaries. In India, the maruts (storm deities) have been greeted with a garland of flowers of Calotropis on Saturdays for centuries. Nowadays, C. gigantea is sold as a plant for home and garden, specifically as a butterfly attractor in a number of countries . The ornamental potential of C. procera has been highlighted in a recent article .
In general, the asclepias (milkweeds), which apart from the Calotropis species, include more than 140 species of plants, have long been included in traditional medicine and have been named after the Greek god of healing. The Greek-Arabian traditional medicine knows the Calotropis plant under the name of Madar and Ushar, where from ancient times, extracts and powders of different parts of Calotropis have been used. Both C. procera [under the name of Raktha Arka] and C. gigantea [under the name of Arka kalpna and Sweta Arka] have been described in the Aryuvedic classics . C. procera was used medically by the ancient Egyptians , seemingly going back as far as the Neolithic period , and the plant can also be found in the Sudanese traditional medicine  as well as in the traditional medicine of North and Central Africa and the Middle East in general and of Central Asia.
Lastly, in Africa, arrow poisons have been derived from the plants. It was this fact that led to the first modern, extensive investigations (Hesse) on the chemical constituents of C. procera, carried out in order to identify the chemical structures of the poisonous components, specifically the cardiac glucoside components.
2. CURRENT NON-MEDICINAL USE OF THE PLANT
2.1. Use as a Building Material
The Calotropis plant has been used for materials, where, when cultivated at 1 to 1.5 m spacing as done in certain regions in South America and the Caribbean, annual yields of up to 500 kg fibre production per ha can be expected . At 525 trees per ha, Nasser et al. have calculated an annual branch yield of even up to 5 tons per ha . The wood is light-weight with a typical air-dried wood density of 0.39 g/cm3 . The stem of the plant is used for roof-making. The use of the stem fibre for paper, nags and nets has also been reported . It has been found that chemomechanical pulping of C. procera leads to a high yield of pulp, suitable for paperboard . Currently, the fibers are still used for rope making  in both Africa and South America. Floss (silky hair, akund floss, 2-3 cm long, 12-42 microns wide) from seed stands have been used as stuffing for pillows and mattresses. This use was known in the Acient Egypt and by 1910, Calotropis procera was cultivated in Djibouti, producing about 1200 kg seed hair per hectare [31, 33]. Even recently, seed hair from Calotropis has been presented as a potential silk replacer . Seed hair has been tested as a thermal insulating material and has been found comparable to Rockwool mineral fibers in its insulating properties. Tests have also been performed with insulating boards made from seed hair, mixed with either phenol-formaldehyde resin or a cornstarch based binder . Insulating material from a composite of C. procera fibres and phenol-formaldehyde resins has been shown to have high water repellency . C. procera flax has been forwarded as a binding material for the improvement of acoustic plaster . Lately, the use of fibers from C. procera as a reinforcement material for thermoplastic composites was suggested, with polypropylene (PP) as matrix polymer and maleated polypropylene Epolene G-3003 as coupling agent . C. procera fibers were tested as reinforcement material in an epoxy matrix, too . Fibers of C. gigantea have gained attention as well, with studies on purifying the fibers for mass production , and on new bleaching  and dyeing techniques [58, 59] to make them commercial products, although dye uptake and dye fixation on the fibres remains a challenge . C. gigantea fibers from bark and seeds have been promoted as promising raw materials for fiber-reinforced composites [60-63]. Polylactic acid (PLA) and polyester have been used as matrix polymers in combination with C. gigantea fibres as reinforcement material [64, 65]. C. gigantea fibres exhibit a high degree of tubular hollowness (80–90%). Along the fiber, no natural twist exists. In one study, the crystallinity of C. gigantea fibres was found to be 42.5% with a crystallinity orientation index of 85.4% . Bast fibres of C. gigantea have been noted to have increased crystallinity upon treatment with 5w% alkali solution, leading to higher tensile strength of the material .
|Fig. (2). Polyisoprene (1).|
During World War 1, rubber for tyres was produced from the C. procera’s latex . Although, the composition of the latex of the plant is very complex, it can consist of up to 25-35% of natural rubber [poly(cis-1,4-isoprene, 1), Fig. 2] . This polyisoprene has coagulative-like properties that lead to an increased adhesiveness of the latex, e.g., when secreted as a response to herbivory .
2.2. Use as Adsorbent
The water-resistance and hydrophobicity of Calotropis fibers, treated and untreated, lend them the potential to be used as adsorbents for hydrocarbons, such as for oil [69, 70]. Typically, the derivatization of the fibers with hydrophobic alkylsilyl and perfluoroalkylsilyl moieties such as with octadecyltrichlorosilane  or with 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane  enhances their oil adsorbent properties. Cao et al. fabricated a roughened Calotropis gigantea fiber by immobilizing copper and nickel nanoparticles on the original fiber by the impregnation method, using NaBH4 as reductant. The treated fibers were noted to readily adsorb oils from model oil–water mixtures . Excellent and selective oil sorption behavior properties of C. procera and C. gigantea blended with cotton and polypropylene fibers were observed by Thilagavathi et al. . The maximum oil sorption capacity of the developed thermally-bonded nonwovens was 40.2 g/g for high density (HD) oil and 23.0 g/g for diesel oil. Pyrolysis of C. gigantea fibers leads to carbon fibers that have a take-up capacity of 130 g/g for model oils in water-oil mixtures . Sheets of C. gigantea fibers are also sandwiched between thin polyether sulfone layers leading to a shapable construct which exhibits an oil sorption capacity of 4.3 – 9.3 g oil/ g sorbent .
The surface of C. gigantea fibers can be functionalized such as with poly(m-phenylenediamine) (2) to be used as selective adsorbents. In the case of poly(m-phenylenediamine) functionalized C. gigantea fibers, these can be prepared easily by oxidative polymerization of the diamine on the surface of the fibers by immersing the fibers into an aqueous solution of m-phenylenediamine in the presence of ammonium persulfate. The functionalized fibers are excellent reductive adsorbents of Cr(VI) . Poly(m-phenylenediamine) 2 functionalized C. gigantea fibers have also been used for the adsorption of ciprofloxacin (4), a fluoroquinolone antibiotic, which is a major pharmaceutical effluent, from wastewater . Treating C. gigantea fibers with aq. NaClO2 and doping them subsequently with polydopamine 3 allows for the adsorption of ciprofloxacin (4) and norfloxacin (5), a further fluoroquinolone antibiotic  (Fig. 2). Dried leaf powder of C. procera has been used successfully as adsorbent for the dyes malachite green (6)  and Congo red (7)  from aqueous solutions (Fig. 3).
2.3. Usage as Fuel
Within limits, the wood of C. procera is utilized as cooking fuel in some areas [81, 82]. Also, the plant is being studied extensively as a source of biofuel  with the gross heat content of the plant estimated at 6.1 kcal/g . Erdman et al. give a heat value of the whole plant of 4.2 kcal/g , Radhaboy et al. put it at 5.2 kcal/g . The heat values of whole plant fractions extracted with benzene, with petroleum ether and with ethyl acetate have been given as 9.6 kcal/g, 13.7 kcal/g, and 7.4 kcal/g, respectively . Both the seeds of C. procera and C. gigantea are judged as having the potential of providing biodiesel conforming to European and ASTM standards  and have a relatively high oil-content (C. gigantea: 31%; C. procera: 26%) . In all published seed oil analyses [89-91] of both C. procera and C. gigantea, oleic acid (10), palmitic acid (12), linoleic acid (9) and stearic acid (13) were the main constituents. Seed oil from C. procera of North Eastern Brazil has been shown to have an oil content of 21%, with a range between 19.7% and 24.0% , with constituent unsaturated palmitoleic (1.7%, 8), linoleic (35.3%, 9), oleic (33.3%, 10) and elaidic (4.2%, 11) acids as well as saturated palmitic (15.8%, 12) and stearic (9.5%, 13) acids [92, 93], some bound in triglycerides . Seeds of C. gigantea, collected in Shwebo District, Myanmar, were equally analyzed to have 33.3 w% oil content with palmitic (15.5%, 12), linoleic (36.3%, 9), oleic (30.3%, 10) and stearic (10.5%, 13) acids along with palmitoleic (0.3%, 8), asclepic (0.8%, 14), linolenic (0.8%, 15), arachidic (0.6%, 16), behenic (0.1%, 17), and lignoceric (0.4%, 18) acids as minor constituents  (Fig. 4).
The use of dry biomass of C. procera and C. gigantea to produce biogas has been studied closely since 1992. The fermentation of a suspension of 4% (w/v) of dried leaves of C. procera in water at an initial pH of 7.5 has been found to give 2·9 to 3·6 litres of biogas day−1 litre−1. The fermentation was found to be fast with 66% of dry material loaded being degraded during the first 2 days of incubation at 30°C with the resulting biogas containing 56–59% (v/v) methane . P. Gourdon et al. record 280 mL volatiles /g solid of C. procera leaves . Biogas production with a mixture of fresh, chopped leafy biomass of both C. procera and C. gigantea with cow and buffalo dung was tried, also [95, 96]. This co-digestion led to an increased volume of biogas produced, albeit with a lower methane and higher carbon dioxide content .
Also, C. procera and C. gigantea have been studied as potential petrocrops. Extraction of the plant itself, especially with hexane and heptane, has led to high-yielding hydrocarbon fractions, which have been forwarded as potentially useful chemical feedstock [83, 85, 97-99]. Within this context, transgenic C. gigantea plants have been grown with alkane contents that were up to 30% higher than in the wild-form of C. gigantea . The biocrude thus obtained was subjected to thermal and catalytic cracking to deliver gas and liquid fuels containing mono- and diaromatics, olefins and saturated alkanes . The gas products from the catalytic cracking process were seen to be propene (22.0% – 26.7%), isobutene (8.1w% - 15.0w%) and pentanes/pentenes (22.7w% - 28.9w%) at temperatures between 460 °C and 520 °C .
Pyrolysis of C. procera derived biomass has been attempted, also. Thus, co-cracking of petroleum vacuum residue with polypropylene and C. procera derived biomass has been found to lead to a lowering of the activation energy as compared to cracking petroleum vacuum residue alone [101, 102].
2.4. Animal Feed
In many regions, livestock feeding on Calotropis plants is limited, and toxicity associated with animal feeding on the plants is a constant problem [103-105], with sheep fatalities having been reported at 5-10 g of latex feed per kg of bodyweight. Wildlife grazing of the plant is scant , but browsing of leaves and flowers by gazelles has been seen, especially in times of drought . The grazing of leaf and flower was observed to some extent also with goats, sheep and cattle in the arid region of Cholistan rangelands in Pakistan . It has been suggested that the toxicity of the plants for animals may depend on biotypes and on the environmental conditions during the plants' growth [109, 110]. It has also been noted that drying may result in the loss of some of the more toxic components such as flavonoid and cardiotonic glycosides of the plant material [111, 112]. Additionally, there have been recent efforts to find safe limits to include the plants in hay and silage as an alternative feed in arid and semi-arid regions [111, 113]. In NW Brazil , and to a smaller extent in parts of India , silk flower hay (SHF, C. procera SW.) has been reported to be suitable for feeding goats, sheep, and camels. In sheep and goat farming, it was noted that substitution of corn and soybean by silk flower hay of up to 30% did not decrease the nutrient uptake by Morada Nova lambs  and did not decrease the sensory attributes of their meat  or important attributes of the milk of the goats .
There has been a study carried out with C. procera grown in the southern coastal region of Puerto Rico, combining the use of C. procera as a biofuel and the use of the processed residues as animal feed . It was found that the crude protein content of unextracted and extracted C. procera was comparable to that of Euphorbia, and was found to be of sufficient level for most goat, sheep, and cattle maintenance.
For human consumption, it has been reported that nectar crystals from dried flowers of C. procera have been used as a sugar substitute. Thus, in Java, the central part of the flower has been processed into a sweetmeat named Chinese candy . On the other hand, it must be recognized that the nectar can contain poisonous components as well. Cases of fatal poisonings of humans with both C. procera and C. gigantea  are known. In general, the cardenolides found in C. procera are toxic to vertebrates.
|Fig. (3). Dried leaf powder of C. procera has been used successfully as adsorbents for the dyes malachite green (6) and Congo red (7) from aqueous solutions.|
|Fig. (4). Carboxylic acid content of C. procera and C. gigantea seed oils.|
2.5. Pesticidal Use of the Plant
The reports on the bioactivity of extracts from both species are numerous, where the extracts have been utilized as herbicide , fungicide , insecticide [123-128], nematicide [129-133], acaricide , and as molluscicide [122, 135, 136]. Traditionally, extracts from C. procera have been used alone or in combination with that of other plants, such as in a combination of the extract of C. procera flowers, Azadirachta indica and Nicotiana tabacum leaves, and Trachyspermum ammi seeds used against the common cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Boophilus) .
2.6. Insecticidal Use – Insects Associated with Calotropis plants
The larvicidal role of C. procera in mosquito control was reported already more than 25 years ago . The latex from the green parts of the plant, which in effect represents a system of defense of the plant itself against insects [68, 122, 138], severely affects larvae development and mortality and suppresses egg hatching  in the mosquito Aedes aegypti, which is a vector of the dengue virus. At the same time, mixing water with aqueous latex extract leads to reduced ovipositioning of gravid A. aegypti females . Laboratory experiments using water without and with various concentrations of larvicidal latex extract seem to indicate that the ovipositioning female can distinguish among the extract concentrations to lay its eggs in the medium with the least larvicidal concentration . Aqueous latex extracts, but not those of the flowers, were shown to also have a larvacidal activity in the mosquito Anopheles labranchiae  and Culex qinquefasciatus [142, 143]. Aqueous leaf extracts were found to have larvacidal activity against Anopheles arabiensis . Also, the extracts exhibited oviposition deterrent activity in the mosquitoes C. qinquefasciatus and A. arabiensis . Moderate larvacidal activity of aq. extracts of C. procera was found against C. quinquefasciatus Say [142, 144, 145] and Anopholes stephensi . Methanolic latex extracts of C. procera have been proven to be the most effective, however, as larvacide against such dengue vectors as A. aegypti. Thus, Singhi et al. have carried out a field study in selected areas of Jodphur City, India, dispersing an aq. solution of a dried methanolic extract of C. procera latex in water tanks and containers that normally function as breeding areas of different mosquito species such as C. quinquefasciatus, A. stephensi, and A. aegypti. A 100% larval mortality was found throughout when applying the solution at a concentration of 100 ppm . Also, methanolic extracts of C. gigantea leaves have larvicidal (1st-4th instar tested) and pupicidal effect on C. quinquefasciatus, A. stephensi, and A. aegypti .
The extracts of C. procera leaves have been shown to have a profound effect on a diminished survival of the fifth instar larvae of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Additionally, the arrest of ovarian growth and the absence of sexual maturity in adult Schistocerca gregaria were noted . Also, latex extracts of C. procera are effective against S. gregaria . Interestingly, the extracts of C. gigantea have been found to be active against S. gregaria as well, with an isolated plant component, a non-protein amino acid, forwarded as an antifeedant , thought to be the active principle. Later, the structure of this amino acid could not be confirmed . Leaf extracts of C. procera were found to be effective against the flesh fly, Sarcophaga haemorrhoidales fallen  and have been advocated as an insect control against the two moths Clostera cupreata (Noctuidae) and Plecoptera reflexa (Noctuidae), where the 3rd instar larvae were targeted . Calotropis procera has been used for the control of the ladybird beetle Henosepilachna elaterii , the painted grasshopper Poecilocerus pictus Fab , the lesser grain borer Rhizoperta dominica [124, 154, 155], the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae and the silver leaf whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius . The root bark of C. gigantea  and aq. leaf extracts of C. procera  show insecticidal activity against the red flour beetle Triboleum castaneum, while the root bark of C. procera is active against the confused flour beetle Triboleum confusum . While mixed extacts from C. procera and other plants have been found most effective against the common cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus (Boophilus) [137, 160] (see above), leaf extracts and whole plant extracts of C. procera alone are successful against the common cattle tick [160, 161] and the Asian blue tick (Rhipcephalus microplus), affecting both the oviposition of female ticks and the larval mortality rate [161, 162]. Cardiac glycosides in the extracts of C. procera can be seen as one of the active principles according to the work by D. H. Al-Rajhy et al. on the efficacy of the extracts on the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii (Acari: Ixodidae) .
Nevertheless, by far, not all insects are affected negatively by the plant. The African monarch, Danaus chrysippus, a butterfly common to many areas in Africa and Asia, thrives on the plant and its caterpillars (1st – 5th instar) utilize some of the latex proteins in their diet. It is suggested that the caterpillars’ proteolytic digestive system destroys the toxic proteins of the Calotropis latex, including the peptidases, and thus makes them immune to the toxic principles of the plant [68, 164]. There also seems to be a fine balance in the feeding behavior of the Danaus chrysippus caterpillars, notably of the younger instars, where the need for nourishment is off-set by the exposure to de facto poisonous cardenolides in the latex, where caterpillars cut the leaves, wait for the exuded latex to dry, and progress on feeding off the leaves while avoiding the latex for the most part [68, 164].
C. procera and C. gigantea are host to a larger number of other insects such as the cossid moth, Semitocossus johannes (Staudinger) , the larvae of which can cause severe damage to the plant. Especially, the nectar of the flowers attracts insects, including ants. The large Arabian carpenter bee, Xylocopa sulcatipes Maa. is noted to build its nests in dry stems of C. procera . Here, even a X. sulcatipes – C. procera coevolutionary pattern has been suggested with X. sulcatipes as the natural co-adapted pollinator . It is known that many species of Asclepias plants, in general, attract insects such as butterflies [168, 169] and milkweed bugs . Ten insect species were recorded in India alone to feed on C. gigantea [171, 172]. Altogether, 65 species of insects and 5 species of mites have been documented on C. procera and C. gigantea . In the United Arab Emirates, the black carpenter bee (Xylocopa ctenoxylocopa fenetrata), canary carpenter bee (Xylocopa koptortosoma aestuans), oriental wasp (Vespa orientalis), and scoliid wasp (Vobalayca flavifrons) are typical insects associated with C. procera. Butterflies will lay eggs on milkweeds as will moths , and it is the caterpillars which incorporate the sequestered cardenolides from the plants in their defense systems. Within this context, the cardenolide fingerprint of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus L., reared on different milkweeds has been studied [174-176]. The transfer of cardiac toxins from the caterpillar feeding on C. procera to the tissue of the adult butterfly has also been noted in the common tiger butterfly, Danaus chrysippus. The grasshopper Poecilocerus pictus feeds on C. gigantea. Again, it was found that cardiac glycosides are taken up by the insect [177, 178]. Here, however, a comparative characterization of the cardiac glycosides of C. gigantea and the feeding P. pictus revealed partial metabolisation of some of the substances in the insect extract. It was found that the insect extract reduces the viability of A549 (carcinomic human a lveolar basal epithelial) and COLO 205 (human caucasian colon adenocarcinoma) cells, inducing apoptosis in COLO 205, where the extract distinguishes between normal human cells and cancer cells [179, 180]. The unpalatability of insects reared on cardiac glycoside containing milkweeds was demonstrated in feeding experiments of Asclepias currasavica L. reared monarchs to the American blue jay Cyanocitta cristata bromia . The aphid Aphis nerii is another insect that thrives on C. gigantea. Aphids feeding on C. gigantea leaves were found to have longer life-spans, with higher fecundity of the females, while the lady-beetle Menochilus sexmaculatus, the main predator of Aphis nerii, exhibited a shorter life-span when on a diet of C. gigantea fed aphids . The Calotropis plants are not only hosts to insects, but to birds such as sunbirds as well.
On the other hand, insects lead also to possible ways for a classical biological control of Calotropis. It has been noted that three pre-dispersal seed predators, the Aak weevil Paramecops farinosus, the Aak fruit fly Dacus persicus in the Indian subcontinent and the Sodom apple fruit fly Dacus longistylus in the Middle East can be seen as prospective biological control agents of the plant .
2.7. Nematicidal/Schistosomicidal/Antihelminthic Activity
Calotropis procera has been used for the control of plant-pathogenic nematodes Meloidogyne javanica [183, 184] and Meloidogyne incognita [132, 185, 186]. It must be remarked that the mortality rates of Meloidogyne incognita juveniles induced by the leaf extracts of C. procera are not as high as that induced by the extracts of some other plants such as Acacia nilotica, Aristilochia bracteolate or Chenopodium album . Latex extracts of C. gigantea have also been used against Meloidogyne incognita as well as against the cowpea cyst nematode Heterodera cajani . Interestingly, the methanolic extracts of Calotopis procera flowers also exhibit schistosomicidal activity . Aqueous and methanolic extracts of dried flowers of C. procera have antihelmintic effect as studied on live Haemonchus contortas . Sheep infected with gastrointestinal nematodes were treated with the extracts and the egg counts in treated sheep decreased significantly  although the activity was found to be lower than that of levamisole. Also, the latex of C. procera has been shown to have antihelmintic effect in sheep [191, 192]. Ethyl acetate solutions of lyophilized C. procera latex inhibited egg hatching of H. contortas, showed a pronounced larvicidal effect (EC50 = 0.22 mg/mL) and inhibited the motility of the parasites by over 80% after 6h contact time .
2.8. Molluscicidal Activity
Much of the here-mentioned activity can be attributed to the cardenolide content of the extracts as could also be shown by the molluscicidal activity of cardenolide extracts from C. procera against the land snail Monacha cantania  and single-compound toxicity studies of uscharin in the snail Thepa pisana . Even fresh leaves of C. gigantea at 200 g/ha have been used to control the golden apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata, in rice . Alcoholic extracts of fruits, leaves, stems, and roots of C. procera were found to show molluscicidal activity against Biomphalaria arabica , the intermediate host of the trematode Schistsoma mansoni in Saudi Arabia.
2.9. Plant Fungicidal Use
Different aerial parts of C. gigantea, such as the leaves, have been used as anti-fungicide, especially against Phyllactinia corylea (powdery mildew), Peridiopsora mori (brown rust), Pseudocercospora mori (black leaf spot), Myrothecium roridum (brown leaf spot), Colletotrichum graminicola, Drechslera sorokiniana (Drechslera leaf blight), Fusarium solani, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Phomopsis sojae (soybean stem blight). Mixtures of extracts of C. gigantea, Azadirachta indica (neem), Datura stramonium and cow manure have been seen to be effective against Fusarim mangiferae, a fungus leading to floral malformation in mango . Extracts of C. procera were found to inhibit growth, sporulation, and the conidial germination of Drechslera biseptata and Fusarium solani . Others have reported the fungi toxic properties of extracts of the plant , especially also against seed-borne mycoflora of wheat, which includes Altemaria alternata, A. clamydophor, Aspergillus niger, A. flavus, Rhizopus oryzae, Mucor spp., Fusarium spp., Drechslera australiensis, Penicillium spp., Curvularia lunata and Cladosporium . Recently, it has been found that methanolic C. procera leaf extracts are active against Macrophomina phaseolina, a fungus prevalent in arid tropical or semitropical regions causing stalk and fruit rot in many crop plants . Extracts of Calotropis procera were found to be active against the fungal pathogen Alternaria solani, which causes early blight disease in tomatoes .
2.10. Allelopathic Activity
Aqueous extracts of dried leaves have a strong adverse effect on the germination of wheat (Triticum aestivum, Graminaea) [121, 202, 203] and influence the germination of barley (Hordeum vulgare, Graminaea), cucumber (Cucumis satires, Curcurbitaceae), radish (Raphanus sativus) , and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenumgraecum, Leguminosae) to a lesser degree . Also, aqueous leaf extracts were reported to exhibit an allelopathic effect on the germination and seedling growth of maize, where inhibition of radicle and plumule growth of four maize cultivars were noted . Flower extracts of C. procera were found to have an effect on the germination of wheat and canola (Brassica napus), not only delaying the germination but also leading to a reduction of root and shoot lengths of the plants. Also, the germination, seedling growth and biomass yield of acacia species such as of Acacia tortilis (Forssk.) are detrimentally influenced by aq. C. procera leaf extract . Aq. whole plant extract mixtures of Datura stramonium and C. procera have been advocated for the management of the invasive parthenium weed Parthenium hysterophorus L . In this case, the allelopathic properties of the extracts were attributed to quercetin (19), p-coumaric acid (20), gallic acid (21), sinapinic acid (22), and chlorogenic acid (23) (Fig. 5). In another study, caffeic acid (24), gentisic acid (25), catechol (26), syringic acid (27), ellagic acid (28), resorcinol (29), and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (30) in addition to gallic and p-coumaric acid, 20 and 21, were the isolated compounds made responsible for the allelopathic behavior of aq. leaf extracts of C. procera, this time on Cassia sophera and Allium cepa L. (onion) (Fig. 6) . Nevertheless, even in the arid wasteland, other plants can be seen growing in close proximity to C. procera. Reversely, it has been noted that buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) has allelopathic toxicity towards the roots of Calotropis .
2.11. Calotropis in Environmental Monitoring and Bioremediation
Calotropis plants can grow under adverse conditions and have been found to be tolerant of pollution. This suggests that the species can be grown in the neighborhood of polluted sites as a remedial measure . Thus, the uptake of metals by C. procera, both from the soil via the roots and from the air via the leaves , has received some interest. The results have been found to vary, where both the conditions on site and the matrix incorporating the heavy metals may well play a role. C. procera has been used for the monitoring of Pb in automobile-
|Fig. (5). Allelopathic compounds of aq. whole plant extracts of C. procera .|
|Fig. (6). Allelopathic compounds of aq. leaf extracts of C. procera .|
exhaust pollution [211, 212]. C. procera has been under discussion as a phytoremediator of soils polluted with metal wastes [213-215]. In some cases, it could be shown that C. procera shows a high transfer factor for Cd, Ni and Pb from the soil to the plant, with the highest concentrations of Pb and Cd found in the fruits, and of Ni in the stem of the plant . The accumulation of Cd in the leaves has also been demonstrated with plants growing on contaminated soil near Riyadh, Saudi Arabia  and on contaminated soil near Agra in the urban North Central area of India . In the same general region, C. procera has been found to have a good bioconcentration factor for Zn, Mn, Cd and Cu, but a low translocation factor, where concentrations of these heavy metals were higher in the roots than in the leaves of the plant . This study is juxtaposed by the findings of M. Singh et al., who showed that C. procera has a moderate bioaccumulation capacity for Co, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn with a high translocation capacity of these metals to the shoots of the plant . On the other hand, a third study has found no accumulation at all of Zn and Ni in leaves, shoots or roots from contaminated soils in the Unnao, Uttar Pradeh area . The results delineating the Cd-uptake of the plant are also not clear-cut. Investigations have shown that Cd(II) salts are readily adsorbed by C. procera at both pH 5.0 and pH 8.0, with a maximum biosorptive capacity of 40 – 50 mg Cd(II) / g of plant material . Interestingly, though, a study of the metal accumulation in C. procera in polluted areas within Lucknow, India, showed little uptake of Cd  and the use of C. procera as indicator plants in heavily contaminated soils surrounding the Mahad AD'Dahab mine, Saudi Arabia, led to no accumulation of Cd in the plants at all, though high concentrations of Cd could be observed in neighboring Pergularia tomentosa and Salsola sp. plants. In this case, however, C. procera could be used as an indicator of As, Pb, Zn (also ref. 224), and Cu . The use of C. procera for the phytostabilisation of Cu and Zn was also suggested by Al-Qahtani  and Dan-Badjo et al. have remarked on the significant uptake by C. procera of both As and Zn from the soil of a gold mining area in Niger . From a location in Punjab, a significant correlation was reported between the Cr and Pb content in the soil and the content of these metals in C. gigantea plants growing in the area . Pb and Cd at levels of 32 to 80 mg/kg (Pb) and of 2.8 to 3.6 mg/kg (Cd) in the leaves of C. procera were found to exhibit toxicity to the plant as evidenced by lower chlorophyll contents in the leaves , leading to reduced photosynthesis of the plant. It must be noted that some additional stress factors may have been contributing, such as the proximity of the plants to heavy road traffic resulting in exposure to various other pollutants. There is some concern regarding the good metal-extraction capability of the plant that often also serves medicinal purposes as the effect of the metal concentration in the plant on the plant's medicinal extracts is not known. Also, the use of Calotropis as fodder in more highly contaminated areas should be avoided .
Processed parts of C. procera have also been used in environmental remediation. Thus, C. procera roots have been utilized in the removal of Cr(III), As, and Cu from water, incl. waste-water [228-231]. Oven dried, ground and sieved C. procera roots of 100 mesh size in fixed-bed columns have been used to remove Pb(II) from water . The results obtained when using C. procera latex in the purification of domestic and industrial wastewater in Nigeria, on the reduction of turbidity, color, odor, microbial load and total coliforms were comparable to those using already proved coagulants such as Moringa oleifera, Jatropha curcas, FeCl3, and aluminum sulfate (alum) . Simple carbonization of C. procera leaves in the presence of sulfuric acid at 150oC left charcoal of 40-60 mesh, which was used to remove Zn(II) from water . Also, polyvinyl-coated activated carbon prepared from C. procera leaves was used for the removal of Zn(II) from synthetic wastewater . Cut C. procera leaves have been studied in water purification in Nigeria, where it was found that treatment significantly reduced the water's turbidity and coliform count . Biosorption studies of Cd(II) on leaf biomass have also been carried out . Polyvinyl coated activated carbon prepared from C. procera leaves was used for the removal of Cd(II) from synthetic wastewater .
Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea are undemanding plants that, while being undesirable weeds in some regions, have economic potential as a source of fuel and chemical feedstock. The review, which is seen as part 1 of a two-part series, showed their use in providing construction materials and, in limitations, their utilization as animal feed. Extracts of C. procera and C. gigantea are employed widely as natural pesticides. The application of the two plants in bioremediation efforts, including in the monitoring of environmental pollutants in the soil was discussed, also.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
The authors thank the UAEU e-Research Support & Consultations specialist Mr. Ahmed Taha.
|||Mueen Ahmed KK, Rana AC, Dixit VK. Calotropis Species (Ascelpediaceace) - A Comprehensive Review. Pharmacogn Mag 2005; 1: 48-52.|
|||Meena AK, Yadav AK, Nirjanan US, et al. A review on Calotropis procera Linn. and its ethnobotany, phytochemical, pharmacological profile. Drug Invention Today 2010; 2: 185-90.|
|||Kumar G, Karthik L, Rao KVB. A review on the pharmacological and phytochemical profile of Calotropis gigantea Linn. Pharmacologyonline 2011; 1: 1-8.|
|||Qureshi AA, Shaista O, Sanghai DB, Setty SR, Bhajipale NS. Phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Calotropis procera. Plant Arch 2008; 8: 23-7.|
|||Juncker T, Schumacher M, Dicato M, Diederich M. UNBS1450 from Calotropis procera as a regulator of signaling pathways involved in proliferation and cell death. Biochem Pharmacol 2009; 78(1): 1-10.
|||Silva MCC, da Silva AB, Texeira FM, et al. Therapeutic and biological activities of Calotropis procera (Ait.) R. Br. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2010; 332-6.
|||Himanshu J, Gururaja MP, Divya S. Calotropis gigantea R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae). Int J Pharm Res 2011; 3: 10-4.|
|||Quazi S, Mathur K, Arora S. Calotropis procera: an overview of its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Indian J Drugs 2013; 1: 63-9. [IJOD].|
|||Yogi B, Gupta SK, Mishra A. Calotropis procera (Madar): a medicinal plant of various therapeutic uses – a review. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci 2016; 5: 74-81.|
|||Kumar SP, Suresh E, Kalavathy S. Review on a potential herb Calotropis gigantea (L.) R. Br. Sch Acad J Pharm 2013; 2: 135-43.|
|||Kadiyala M, Ponnusankar S, Elango K. Calotropis gigantiea (L.) R. Br (Apocynaceae): a phytochemical and pharmacological review. J Ethnopharmacol 2013; 150(1): 32-50.
|||Space JC, Lorence DH, LaRosa AM. Report to the Republic of Palau: 2008 update on Invasive Plant Species 2009; 18.|
|||Hancock IR, Henderson CP. Flora of the Solomon IslandsResearch Bulletin No 7, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara 1988; 54.|
|||Howard RA. Flora of the Lesser Antilles, Leeward and Windward Islands 1989; 6|
|||Krings A, Areces Berazain F, Lazcano Lara JC. New and re-discovered milkweeds from Cuba: Calotropis gigantea and Gonolobus stephanotrichus. Willdenowia 2005; 35: 315-8.
|||Cavalcante A, Major I. Invasion of alien plants in the Caatinga biome. Ambio 2006; 35(3): 141-3.
|||Gracia C A, Rangel-Buitrago N, Castro-Barros J-D. Non-native plant species in the Atlantico Department Coastal Dune Systems, Caribbean of Colombia: A new management challenge. Mar Pollut Bull 2019; 141: 603-10.
|||Ibrahim AH. Tolerance and avoidance responses to salinity and water stresses in Calotropis procera and Suaeda aegyptiaca. Turk J Agric For 2013; 37: 352-60.|
|||Al-Zahrani HS. Effects on salinity stress on growth of Calotropis procera seedlings. Bull Pure Appl Sci 2002; 21: 109-22.|
|||Karschon R. Contributions to the arboreal flora of Israel: Calotropis procera (Willd.) R.Br La-Yaaron 1970; 20: 1-6,41-48. (Hebrew and English).|
|||Boutraa T. Effects of water stress on growth, water use efficiency, leaf area and chlorophyll content in the desert shrub Calotropis procera. J Int Environ Appl Sci 2010; 5: 124-32.|
|||Ksiksi TS. Acacia tortilis and Calotropis procera: do they substantially promote soil carbon sequestration? Open J Soil Sci 2012; 2: 116-22.
|||Migongo-Bake E, Elskamp F, Mwangi A, Cherogony L. Success stories in the struggle against desertification – a holistic and integrated approach to environmental conservation and sustainable livelihoods 2002.|
|||Parrotta JA. Healing plants of Peninsular India 2001.
|||Sharma GP, Kumar M, Raghubanshi AS. Urbanization and road-use determines Calotropis procera distribution in the eastern Indo-Gangetic plain, India. Ambio 2010; 39(2): 194-7.
|||Neumann K. Zur Vegetationsgeschichte der Ostsahara im Holozaen; Holzkohlen aus praehistorischen Fundstellen.Forschungen zur Umweltgeschichte der Ostsahara 1989; 13-182.|
|||Little EL Jr, Woodbury RO, Wadsworth FH. Trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands 1974; 2: 1024.|
|||Forster PI, Little DJ, Nicholas A. Asclepiadaceae, Flora of Australia 1996; Vol. 8: 214.|
|||Jagtap VA, Usman MRM, Salunkhe PS, Gagrani MB. Anti-inflammatory activity of Calotropis gigantea Linn. leaves extract on in-vitro models Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res 2010; 1-5.|
|||Dymock W. A history of the principal drugs of vegetable originPharmacographia Indica 1972; 15.|
|||Bertreau A, Calotropis Les. Bibliothèque d’Agriculture coloniale 1913; 1-87.|
|||Lewin L. Calotropis procera, ein neues digitalisartig wirkendes Herzmittel Arch. Exp Path Pharmakol 1913; 71: 142-56.
|||Neuwinger HD. Afrikanische Arzneipflanzen und Jagdgifte, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart 1994; 224.|
|||Newton C, Midant-Reynes B. Environmental change and settlement shifts in Upper Egypt during the Predynastic: charcoal analysis at Adaima. Holocene 2007; 17: 1109-18.
|||Bard KA, Fattovich R, Borojevic K, Berna F, Zazzaro C. Harbor of Pharaohs to the Land of Punt (Marsa/Wadi Gawasis Report) 2008; 22-38.|
|||Maroyi A. In Medicinal Plants 2Plant Resources of Tropical Africa 2013; 11: 31.|
|||Belgiorno MR, Lentini A, Scala G. The textile industry (2000 BC) of Pyrgos-Mavroraki (Cyprus). Archaelogical Textiles Newsletter 2006; 25: 30.|
|||Potts DT, Reade WJ. New evidence for late third millennium linen from Tell Abraq, Umm-Al-Qaiwain, UAE. Paéorient 1993; 19: 96-106.|
|||Mikula R. Butterfly plants for your garden www.butterflybreeders.com/pages/bflygdning/butterflyplants.html2001.|
|||Petrie JMM. Arabian Desert Primer: Ornamental potential of hyperarid adapted plants from Saudi Arabia. Desert Plants 2007; 23: 19-32.|
|||Arya SK, Agarwal VD. Antiquity of arka kalpna in Ayurvedic classics. Sacitra Ayurveda 1985; 38: 477-80.|
|||Ebbell B. A contribution to the earliest history of leprosy. Int J Lepr 1935; 3: 257-63.|
|||Greiss AME. Anatomical identification of plant remains and other materials from (1) El-Omari excavation at Helwan from the first dynasty. Bull Inst Egypte 1955; 36: 227-35.|
|||Dieye AM, Tidjani MA, Diouf A, Bassene E, Faye B. Senegalese pharmacopeia: study of acute toxicity and antitussive activity of C. procera (Ait.). Dakar Méd 1993; 38: 69-72.
|||Nasser RA, Al-Mefarrej HA, Khan PR, Alhafta KH. Technological Properties of Calotropis procera (Ait.) wood and its relation to utilization. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 2012; 12: 5-16.|
|||Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 40 2009.www.worldagroforestry.org/resources/databases/agroforestree|
|||Khristova P, Tissot M. Soda-anthraquinone pulping of Hibiscus sabdariffa (Karkadeh) and Calotropis procera from Sudan. Bioresour Technol 1995; 53: 67-72.
|||Oun AA, Rhim JW. Characterization of nanocelluloses isolated from Ushar (Calotropis procera) seed fiber: effect of isolation method. Mater Lett 2016; 168: 146-50.
|||Batello C, Marzot M, Toure AH. The future is an ancient lake: traditional knowledge, biodiversity and genetic resources for food and agriculture in Lake Chad Basin ecosystems. FAO Interdepartmental Working Group on biological diversity for food and agriculture, Rome 2004.www.fao.org/docrep/010/y5118e/y5118e00.htm|
|||Ali ME-S, Zeitoun OM. Discovering and manufacturing a new natural insulating material extracted from a plant growing up in Saudi Arabia. J Eng Fibers Fabrics 2012; 7: 88-94.
|||Ali ME-S. US Pat. 20130193365 (Aug. 1, 2013), Chem Abstr 2013; 159: 294814.. Insulation material based on natural fibers from flowering plant seeds in a phenol-formaldehyde resin or cornstarch binder|
|||Bamberger JJ. GB398547 (March 18, 1933) Improvements in or relating to acoustic plaster|
|||Nourbakhsh A, Ashori A, Kouhpayehzadeh M. Giant Milkweed (Calotropis persica) Fibers — A Potential Reinforcement Agent for Thermoplastics Composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 2009; 28: 2143-9.
|||Yoganandam K, Ganeshan P. NagarajaGanesh, B.; Raja, K. Characterization studies on Calotropis procera fibers and their performance as reinforcements in epoxy matrix. J Nat Fibers 2019.
|||Liu D. (Hunan Yunjin Group Co Ltd), CN 103031625 (Jan 24, 2013) Apparatus for removing seeds from Calotropis gigantea fibre|
|||Zhao T, Wang M, Zhou J. CN 103397508A (July 30, 2013), Low-carbon low damage bleaching method of Calotropis gigantea fiber fabric|
|||Chen Q, Zhao T, Wang M, Wang J. Studies of the fibre structure and dyeing properties of Calotropis gigantea, kapok, and cotton fibres 2013; 448-53.|
|||Gao J, Zhao T. Dyeing behavior of Calotropis gigantea fibre with direct dyes 2012; 33-5.|
|||Ashori A, Bahreini Z. Evaluation of C. gigantea as a promising raw material for fiber-reinforced composite. J Compos Mater 2009; 43: 1297-304.
|||Velusamy K, Navaneethakrishnan P, Rajeshkumar G, Sathishkumar TP. The influenxe of fiber content and length on mechanical and water absorption properties of Calotropis gigantea fiber reinforced epoxy composites. J Ind Text 2019; 48: 1274-90.
|||Vinod A, Vijay R, Singaravelu D, Lenin D. Thermomechanical characterization of Calotropis gigantea stem powder-filled jute fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Nat Fibers 2018; 15: 648-57.
|||Ganeshan P. NagarajaGanesh, B.; Ramshankar, P.; Raja, K. Calotropis gigantea fibers: A potential reinforcement for polymer matrices. Int J Polym Anal Charact 2018; 23: 271-7.
|||Karthik T, Ganesan P. Light-weight bio-composites from Calotropis gigantea stem fiber. Melliand International 2012; 18: 214-5.|
|||Babu DG, Babu SK, Kishore NP. Tensile and wear behavior of Calotropis gigantea fruit fiber reinforced polyester composites. Proc Eng 2014; 97: 531-5.
|||Ramasamy R, Reddy KO, Rajulu AV. Extraction and characterization of Calotropis gigantea bast fibers as novel reinforcement for composites materials. J Nat Fibers 2018; 15: 527-38.
|||Mohamed NH, Ismail MA, Abdel-Mageed WM, Shoreit AAM. Biodegradation of natural rubber latex of Calotropis procera by two endophytic fungal species. J Bioremediat Biodegrad 2017; 8: 1-5.
|||Ramos MV, Demarco D, da Costa Souza IC, de Freitas CDT. Lactifiers, latex, and their role in plant defense. Trends Plant Sci 2019; 24(6): 553-67.
|||Zheng Y, Zhu Y, Wang A, Hu H. Potential of Calotropis gigantea fiber as an absorbent for removal of oil from water. Ind Crops Prod 2016; 83: 387-90.
|||Zheng Y, Cao E, Zhu Y, Wang A, Hu H. Perfluorosilane treated Calotropis giganteafiber: Instant hydrophobic–oleophilic surface with efficient oil-absorbing performance. Chem Eng J 2016; 295: 477-83.
|||Zheng Y, Cao EJ, Tu LX, Wang AQ, Hu HM. A comparative study for oil-absorbing performance of octadecyltrichlorosilane treated Calotropis gigantea fiber and kapok fiber. Cellulose 2017; 24: 989-1000.
|||Cao E, Xiao W, Duan W, Wang N, Wang A, Zheng Y. Metallic nanoparticles roughened Calotropis gigantea fiber enables efficient absorption of oils and organic solvents. Ind Crops Prod 2018; 115: 275-9.
|||Thilagavathi G, Praba Karan C, Das D. Oil sorption and retention capacities of thermally-bonded hybrid nonwovens prepared from cotton, kapok, milkweed and polypropylene fibers. J Environ Manage 2018; 219: 340-9.
|||Tu LX, Duan WZ, Xiao WL, Fu CX, Wang AQ, Zheng Y. Calotropis gigantea fiber derived carbon fiber enable fast and efficient absorption of oils and organic solvents. Separ Purif Tech 2018; 192: 30-5.
|||Xiao W, Wang N, Niu B, Fu C, Zhou L, Zheng Y. Polyethylene sulfone assisted shape construction of Calotropis gigantea fiber for preparing a sustainable and reusable oil sorbent. Cellulose 2019; 26: 3923-33.
|||Cao E, Duan W, Yi L, Wang A, Zheng Y. Poly(m-phenylenediamine) functionalized Calotropis gigantean fiber for coupled adsorption reduction for Cr(VI). J Mol Liq 2017; 240: 225-32.
|||Cao E, Duan W, Wang A, Zheng Y. Oriented growth of poly(m-phenylenediamine) on Calotropis gigantea fiber for rapid adsorption of ciprofloxacin. Chemosphere 2017; 171: 223-30.
|||Yi LS, Liang GW, Xiao WL, Duan WZ, Wang AQ, Zheng Y. Rapid nitrogen-rich modification of Calotropis gigantea fiber for highly efficient removal fluoroquinolone antibiotics. J Mol Liq 2018; 256: 408-15.
|||Kaur R, Kaur H. Calotropis procera as effective adsorbent for removal of malachite green dye: a comprehensive study. Desalination Water Treat 2017; 78: 252-62.|
|||Kaur R, Kaur H. Calotropis procera an effective adsorbent for removal of Congo red dye: isotherm and kinetc modelling. Model Earth Syst Environ 2017; 3
|||Varshney AC, Bhoi KL. Cloth from bast fiber of the Calotropis procera (Aak) plant. Biol Wastes 1988; 26: 229-32.
|||Ganaba S, Ouadba JM, Bognounou O. Fuelwood in the Sahelian region of Burkina Faso: Ethnic preferences. Sécheresse 1998; 9: 261-8.|
|||Padmaja KV, Atheya N, Bhatnagar AK, Singh KK. Conversion of Calotropis procera biocrude to liquid fuels using thermal and catalytic cracking. Fuel 2009; 88: 780-5.
|||Kalita D, Saikia CN. Chemical constituents and energy content of some latex bearing plants. Bioresour Technol 2004; 92(3): 219-27.
|||Erdman MD, Erdman BA. Calotropis procera as an alternative source of plant hydrocarbons. Econ Bot 1981; 35: 467-72.
|||Radhaboy G, Pugazhvadivu M, Ganeshan P, Ramshankar P. Analysis of Thermochemical behaviour of Calotropis procera parts for their potentiality International Journal of Ambient Energy 2019.
|||De S, Bag A, Mukherji S. Potential use of Pedilanthus tithymaloides Poit. as a renewable resource of plant hydrocarbons. Bot Bull Acad Sin 1997; 38: 105-8.|
|||Razon LF. Philippine plant oils as feedstock for Biodiesel. Philipp Agric Sci 2008; 91: 278-86.|
|||Sundar Rao K, Pantulu AJ, Lakshminarayana G. Analysis of C. gigantea, Acia caesia, and Abelmoschus ficulneus seeds. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1983; 60: 1259-61.
|||Barbosa MO, de Almeida-Cortez JS, da Silva SI, de Oliveira AFM. Seed oil content and fatty acid composition from different populations of Calotropis procera (Aiton) W. T. Aiton (Apocynaceae). J Am Oil Chem Soc 2014; 91: 1433-41.
|||Phoo ZWMM, Razon LF, Knothe G, et al. Evaluation of Indian milkweed (Calotropis gigantea) seed oil as alternative feedstock for biodiesel. Ind Crops Prod 2014; 54: 226-32.
|||de Sousa LV, Santos APB, di Souza L, Dias Santos AG, Beatriz A. Evaluation of the properties of Calotropis procera oil aiming the production of Biodiesel, Orbital: The Electronic. J Chem 2018; 10: 147-52.|
|||Traore AS. Biogas production from C. procera: a latex plant found in West Africa. Bioresour Technol 1992; 41: 105-9.
|||Gourdon R, Leger P, Vermande P. Methane recovery by anaerobic digestion of cellulosic material available in Sahel. Biol Wastes 1989; 30: 181-7.
|||Manikandan M, Arumugam R. Potentiality of Calotropis procera on the yield of biocrudes and biogas production. J Phytol 2010; 2: 33-40.|
|||Shilpkar P, Shah M, Chaudhry DR. An alternate use of Calotropis gigantea: biomethanation. Curr Sci India 2007; 92: 435-7.|
|||Erdman MD. Nutrient and cardenolide composition of unextracted and solvent-extracted Calotropis procera. J Agric Food Chem 1983; 31(3): 509-13.
|||Carruthers IB, Griffiths DJ, Home V, Williams IR. Hydrocarbons from Calotropis procera in Northern Australia. Biomass 1984; 4: 275-82.
|||Kalita D. Hydrocarbon plant – new source of energy for the future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008; 12: 455-71.
|||Zhao B, Sun J, Wang X. (Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences) CN 202586271 (Jan 11, 2012) Method of generating high-alkane content in Calotropis gigantea through genetic transformation|
|||Ahmaruzzaman M, Sharma DK. Coprocessing of petroleum vacuum residue with plastics, coal, and biomass and its synergistic effects. Energy Fuels 2007; 21: 891-7.
|||Ahmaruzzaman M, Sharma DK. Characterization of liquid products from the co-cracking of ternary and quaternary mixture of petroleum vacuum residue, polypropylene, Samla coal and Calotropis procera. Fuel 2008; 87: 1967-73.
|||Mahmoud OM, Adam SEI, Tartour G. The effects of Calotropis procera on small ruminants. I. Effects of feeding sheep with the plant. J Comp Pathol 1979; 89(2): 241-50.
|||Mahmoud OM, Adam SEI, Tartour G. The effects of Calotropis procera on small ruminants. II. Effects of administration of the latex to sheep and goats. J Comp Pathol 1979; 89(2): 251-63.
|||el Badwi , Samia MA, Adam SE, Shigidi MT, Hapke HJ. Studies on laticiferous plants: toxic effects in goats of Calotropis procera latex given by different routes of administration. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1998; 105(11): 425-7.
|||Sharma GK. Calotropis procera and Calotropis gigantea. Indian J Veterinary Sci 1934; 4: 63-74.|
|||Heuzé V, Tran G, Baumont R, Bastianelli D. Calotropis (Calotropis procera) Feedipedia 2016.http://www.feedipedia.org/node/588|
|||Abdullah M, Rafay M, Hussain T, et al. Nutritive potential and palatability preference of browse foliage by livestock in arid rangelands of Cholistan desert (Pakistan). J Anim Plant Sci 2017; 27: 1656-64.|
|||Radunz BL, Wilson G, Beere G. Feeding rubberbush (Calotropis procera) to cattle and sheep. Aust Vet J 1984; 61(7): 243-4.
|||Lottermoser BG. Colonisation of the rehabilitated Mary Kathleen uranium mine site (Australia) by Calotropis procera: toxicity risk to grazing animals. J Geochem Explor 2011; 111: 39-46.
|||dos Santos Belém C, de Souza AM, de Lima PR, de Carvalho FAL, Queiroz MAA, da Costa MM. Digestibility, fermentation and microbiological characteristics of Calotropis procera silage with different quantities of grape pomace. Cienc Agrotec 2016; 40: 698-705.
|||Mello MM, Vaz FA, Gonҫalves LC, Saturnino HM. Estudo fitoquímíco da Calotropis procera Ait., sua utilizaҫão na alimentaҫão de caprinos: Efitos clínicos e bioquímicos séericoos. Belo Horizonte, MG. Rev Bras Saúda Prod An 2001; 2: 15-20.|
|||Costa RG, de Medeiros AN, Alves AR, de Medeiros GR. Prospects for use of rooster tree (Calotropis procera) in animal production. Rev Caatinga 2009; 22: 1-9.|
|||Madruga MS, Arruda SGB, Narain N, Souza JG. Castration and slaughter age effects on panel assessment and aroma compounds of the “mestiço” goat meat. Meat Sci 2000; 56(2): 117-25.
|||Nehra OP, Oswal MC, Faroda AS. Management of fodder tree in Haryana. Indian Farming 1987; 37: 31-3.|
|||Torres JF, Braga AP, Lima GFC, et al. Utilizaҫão do feno de flor-de-seda (Calotropis procera ait. r. br.) na alimentaҫão de ovinos. Acta Vet Bras 2010; 4: 42-50.|
|||Costa RG, da Silva NV, de Azevedo PS, et al. Meat quality of lambs fed silk flower hay (Calotropis procera SW.) in their diet. Rev Bras Zootec 2011; 40: 1266-71.
|||Pereira GF, Gracindo APAC, Tinoco AFD, de Oliveria PHM, Rangel AHD. Fatty acid profile of milk of goats fed with growing levels of flor-de-seda hay. Rev Caatinga 2009; 22: 206-10.|
|||Uphof JCTh. Dictionary of Economic Plants 1959.|
|||Bengal: Report of the Chemical Examiner for 1940 The British Pharmaceutical Codex 1934; .|
|||Al-Zahrani HS, Al-Robai SA. Allelopathic effect of Calotropis procera leaves extract on seed germination of some plants. JKAU: Sci 2007; 19: 115-26.
|||Larhsini M, Lazrek HB, Bousaid M, Jana M, Amarouch H. Evaluation of antifungal and molluscicidal properties of extracts of Calotropis procera. Fitoterapia 1997; 68: 371-3.|
|||Ahmed UAM, Shi Z, Bashier NHH, Muafi K, Hao Z, Guo Y. Evaluation of insecticidal potentials of aqueous extracts of C. procera Ait. against Henosepilachna elaterii Rossi. J Appl Sci (Faisalabad) 2006; 6: 2466-70.
|||Jacob S, Sheila MK. A note on the protection of stored rice from the lesser grain borer Rhizoperta dominica Fabr. By indigenous plant products. Indian J Entomol 1993; 55: 337-9.|
|||Khan SM, Siddiqui MN. Potential of some indigenous plants as pesticides against larvae of cabbage butterfly Pieris brassicae L. Sarhad J Agric 1994; 10: 291-301.|
|||Moursy LE. Insecticidal activity of Calotropis procera extracts of the flesh fly, Sarcophaga haemorrhoidalis fallen. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 1997; 27(2): 505-14.
|||Girdhar G, Deval K, Mittal PK, Vasudevan P. Mosquito control by Calotropis latex. Pesticides 1984; 18: 26-9.|
|||Barati R, Golmohammadi G, Ghajarie H, Zarabi M, Mansouri R. Efficiency of some herbal pesticides on reproductive parameters of silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Arch Phytopathol Pflanzenschutz 2014; 47: 212-21.
|||Rakesh P, Alok K, Neetu K. Nematicidal activity in flowers of some medicinal and aromatic plants. Indian J Entomol 2001; 31: 96-8.|
|||Anver S, Alam MM. Effect of latex seed dressing on interacting root-knot and reniform nematodes. Afro-Asian J Nematol 1992; 2: 17-20.|
|||Charu J, Trivedi PC. Nematicidal activity of certain plants against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, infecting chickpea, Cicer arietinum. Ann Plant Prot Sci 1997; 5: 171-4.|
|||Maqbool MA, Hashmi S, Ghaffar A. Effect of latex extracts from Euphorbia caducifolia and Calotropis procera on root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infesting tomato and egg plant. Pak J Nematol 1987; 43-7.|
|||Verma BS, Verma KK. Toxicity of some indigenous plant extracts to root-knot, seed gall and citrus nematodes. Pesticides 1989; 23: 25-7.|
|||Chungsamarnyart N, Ratanakreetakul C, Jansawan W. Acaricidal activity of the combination of plant crude extracts to cattle ticks. Kasetsart J Natl Sci 1994; 28: 649-60.|
|||Hussein HI, Kamel A, Abou-Zeid M, Abdel-Khalek , El-Sebae H, Saleh MA. Uscharin, the most potent molluscicidal compound tested against land snails. J Chem Ecol 1994; 20(1): 135-40.
|||Al-Sarar A, Hussein H, Abobakr Y, Bayoumi A. Molluscicidal activity of methomyl and cardenolide extracts from Calotropis procera and Adenium arabicum against the land snail Monacha cantiana. Molecules 2012; 17(5): 5310-8.
|||Zaman MA, Iqbal Z, Abbas RZ, et al. In vitro and in vivo acaricidal activity of a herbal extract. Vet Parasitol 2012; 186(3-4): 431-6.
|||Konno K. Plant latex and other exudates as plant defense systems: roles of various defense chemicals and proteins contained therein. Phytochemistry 2011; 72(13): 1510-30.
|||Ramos MV, Bandeira GdeP, de Freitas CD, et al. Latex constituents from Calotropis procera (R. Br.) display toxicity upon egg hatching and larvae of Aedes aegypti (Linn.). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2006; 101(5): 503-10.
|||Singhi M, Joshi V, Sharma RC, Sharma K. Ovipositioning behavior of Aedes aegypti in different concentrations of latex of Calotropis procera: studies on refractory behavior and its sustenance across genotrophic cycles. Dengue Bull 2004; 28: 184-8.|
|||Markouk M, Bekkouche K, Larhsini M, Bousaid M, Lazrek HB, Jana M. Evaluation of some Moroccan medicinal plant extracts for larvicidal activity. J Ethnopharmacol 2000; 73(1-2): 293-7.
|||Shahi M, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Iranshahi M, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd MY. Larvicidal efficacy of latex and extract of Calotropis procera (Gentianales: Asclepiadaceae) against Culex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). J Vector Borne Dis 2010; 47(3): 185-8.
|||Tahir HM, Ishaq T, Mukhtar MK, Khan SY, Ahmed L. Potential use of Calotropis procera (milk weed) to control Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: culicidae). Pak J Zool 2013; 45: 615-21.|
|||Elimam AM, Elmalik KH, Ali FS. Efficacy of leaves extract of Calotropis procera Ait. (Asclepiadaceae) in controlling Anopheles arabiensis and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Saudi J Biol Sci 2009; 16(2): 95-100.
|||Rahuman AA, Bagavan A, Kamaraj C, Saravanan E, Zahir AA, Elango G. Efficacy of larvicidal botanical extracts against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res 2009; 104(6): 1365-72.
|||Singhi M, Purohit A, Chattopadhyay S. Effectiveness and feasibility of methanol extracted latex of Calotropis procera as larvicide against dengue vectors of western Rajasthan, India. J Vector Borne Dis 2015; 52(2): 142-6.
|||Kovendan K, Murugan K, Prasanna Kumar K, et al. Mosquitocidal properties of Calotropis gigantea (Family: Asclepiadaceae) leaf extract and bacterial insecticide, Bacillus thuringiensis, against the mosquito vectors. Parasitol Res 2012; 111(2): 531-44.
|||Abbassi K, Kadiri ZA, Ghaout S. Biological activity of Calotropis procera (Ait. R. Br) leaves on the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria, Forsk. 1775) Zoologica baetica 2004; 15: 153–166.|
|||Al Robai AA. Toxicological studies on the latex of the uscher plant C. procera (Ait) in Saudi Arabia. IV. Effects of partly purified uscher latex and of the poison gland secretion of the uscherhopper; Poekilocerus bufonius Klug on the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria Forskal. (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Arab Gulf J Sci Res 1997; 15: 709-16.|
|||Pari K, Rao PJ, Devakumar C, Rastogi JN. A novel insect antifeedant nonprotein amino acid from Calotropis gigantea. J Nat Prod 1998; 61(1): 102-4.
|||Suparpprom C, Vilaivan T. Synthesis of 2-[4′-(ethylcarbamoyl)phenyl]-N-acetylglycine, the proposed structure for giganticine. J Nat Prod 2001; 64(8): 1114-6.
|||Rashmi S. K.P.; Arya, S. Phytochemical profile and evaluation of insecticidal efficacy of Calotropis procera against defoliators. J Med Plants Res 2011; 5: 6738-43.
|||Chandra H, Lal P. Food preference studies of “AK” grasshopper Poekilocerus pictus Fab. Plant Protect Bull Faridabad 1993; 45: 3-10.|
|||Amin MR, Shahjahan M, El-Taj HF, Iqbal TMT, Hussain MA. Use of akanda, biskatali, and neem leaves as botanical insecticides against lesser grain borer. Bangladesh J Entomol 2000; 10: 1-13.|
|||Neenah G. Potential of using flavonoids, latex and extracts from Calotropis procera (Ait.) as grain protectants against two coleopteran pests of stored rice. Ind Crops Prod 2013; 45: 327-34.
|||Reihaneh B, Golamrezah G, Hamid G, Mehdi Z, Raziyeh M. The effects of some botanical insecticides and pymetrozine on life table parameters of silver leaf whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pestic Phytomed 2013; 28: 47-55.
|||Alam P, Ali M. Phytochemical investigation of C. procera Ait. roots. Indian J Chem 2009; 48B: 443-6.|
|||Abbasi AB, Bibi R, Khan AA, Iqbal MS, Sherani J, Khan AM. Assessment of Calotropis procera Aiton and Datura alba Nees leaves extracts as bio-insecticides against Tribolium castaneum Herbst in stored wheat Triticium aetivum L., J. Biofertil. Biopest 2012; 3: 126-9.|
|||Jahan S, Maman A, Khan AR. Insecticidal effect of akanda (Calotropis procera) on Tribolium confusum Duval (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Bangladesh J Zool 1991; 19: 261-8.|
|||Nithya V, Kamalam M, Umakanthan T. Screening of indigenous medicinal plants for their acaricidal activity against catlle ticks under in vivo condition. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2015; 6: 3049-52.|
|||Shyma KP, Gupta JP, Ghosh S, Patel KK, Singh V. Acaricidal effect of herbal extracts against cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus using in vitro studies. Parasitol Res 2014; 113(5): 1919-26.
|||Khan A, Nasreen N, Niaz S, et al. Acaricidal efficacy of Calotropis procera (Asclepiadaceae) and Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae) against Rhipicephalus microplus from Mardan, Pakistan. Exp Appl Acarol 2019; 78(4): 595-608.
|||Al-Rajhy DH, Alahmed AM, Hussein HI, Kheir SM. Acaricidal effects of cardiac glycosides, azadirachtin and neem oil against the camel tick, Hyalomma dromedarii (Acari: Ixodidae). Pest Manag Sci 2003; 59(11): 1250-4.
|||Pereira DA, Ramos MV, Souza DP, et al. Digestibility of defense proteins in latex of milkweeds by digestive proteases of Monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus L.: a potential determinant of plant-herbivore interactions. Plant Sci 2010; 179: 348-55.
|||Al Dhafer HM, Aldryhim YN, Elgharbawy AA. Aspects of the life-history of Semitococcus johannes (Staudinger) (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) feeding on the milkweed Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T., Aiton in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Kans Entomol Soc 2013; 86: 133-44.
|||Hannan MA, Alqarni AS, Owayss AA, Engel MS. The large carpenter bees of central Saudi Arabia, with notes on the biology of Xylocopa sulcatipes Maa (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopinae). ZooKeys 2012; 201(201): 1-14.
|||Willmer PG. The role of insect water balance in pollination ecology: Xylocopa and Calotropis. Oecologia 1988; 76(3): 430-8.
|||Brower LP. Ecological chemistry. Sci Am 1969; 220(2): 22-9.
|||Parsons JA. A digitalis-like toxin in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L. J Physiol 1965; 178: 290-304.
|||Duffey SS, Scudder GEE. Cardiac glycosides in North American Asclepiadaceae, a basis of unpalatability in brightly colored Hemiptera and Coleoptera. J Insect Physiol 1972; 18: 63-78.
|||Pugalenthi P, Livingstone D. Susceptibility-linked population dynamics of insects associated with Calotropis gigantea (L) R. Br. (Asclepiadaceae) of the Maruthamalai scrub jungle, India. Ann Entomol 1993; 11: 39-42.|
|||Saikia HC, Das BK, Kalita J. Studies on the Insects associated with calotropis gigantea in Guwahati city of Assam, India. J Zool Stud 2015; 2: 6-13.|
|||Dhileepan K. Prospects for the classical biological control of Calotropis procera (Apocynaceae) using coevolved insects. Biocontrol Sci Technol 2014; 24: 977-98.
|||Malcolm SB, Cockrell BJ, Brower LP. Cardenolide fingerprint of monarch butterflies reared on common milkweed,Asclepias syriaca L. J Chem Ecol 1989; 15(3): 819-53.
|||Martin RA, Lynch SP, Brower LP, Malcolm SB, Van Hook T. Cardenolide content, emetic potency, and thin-layer chromatography profiles of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, and their larval host-plant milkweed, Asclepias humistrata, in Florida. Chemoecol 1992; 3: 1-13.
|||Martin RA, Lynch SP. Cardenolide content and thin-layer chromatography profiles of monarch butterflies,Danaus plexippus L., and their larval host-plant milkweed,Asclepias asperula subsp.Capricornu (woods.) woods., in north central Texas. J Chem Ecol 1988; 14(1): 295-318.
|||Livingstone D, Pugalenthi P. Biology of Poecilocerus pictus (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae) on the basis of its nutritional ecology. J Entomol Res 1992; 16: 267-72. [New Dehli].|
|||Pugalenthi P, Livingstone D. Cardenolides (heart poisons) in the painted grasshopper Poecilocerus pictus (Orthoptera: Pyrgomorphidae) feeding on the milkweed Calotropis gigantea L. (Asclepiadaceae). J NY Entomol Soc 1995; 103: 191-6.|
|||Mathen C, Hardikar B. Cytotoxic compounds from Poecilocerus pictus feeding on Calotropis gigantea. J Exp Ther Oncol 2010; 8(3): 177-85.
|||Mathen C, Peter SM, Hardikar BP. Comparative evaluation of the cytotoxic and apoptotic potential of Poecilocerus pictus and Calotropis gigantea. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 2011; 30(1): 83-92.
|||Brower LP, van Brower J, Corvino JM. Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1967; 57(4): 893-8.
|||Murugan K, Jeyabalan D, Kumar NS, Nathan SS, Sivaramakrishnan S. Influence of host plant on growth and reproduction of Aphis nerii and feeding and prey utilization of its predator Menochilus sexmaculatus. Indian J Exp Biol 2000; 38(6): 598-603.
|||Ahmad R, Shahab MZ, Inam-ul-Haq M, Javed N, Dogar MA, Khan MY. Effect of soil amendment with Calotropis procera for the control of Meloidogyne javanica infection on egg plant. Pak J Nematol 1996; 14: 55-9.|
|||Khurma UR, Chaudhary P. Comparative effects of extracts of different parts of Calotropis procera, Cassia fistula, Ricinus communis, and Sesbania sesban on Meloidogyne javanica juveniles. J Environ Biol 1999; 20: 287-8.|
|||Parvatha RP, Rao MS. Eco-friendly management of Meloidogyne incognita on tomato by integration of Verticillium chlamydosporium with neem and Calotropis leaves, Zeitschr. f. Pflanzenkrankheiten u. Pflanzenschutz 1999; 106: 530-3.|
|||Rehman B, Ahmad F, Babalola OO, Ganai MA, Parihar K, Siddiqui MA. Usages of botanical extracts for the management of the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in chickpea. J Pure Appl Microbiol 2013; 7: 2385-8.|
|||Elbadri GA, Lee DW, Park JC, Yu HB, Choo HY. Evaluation of various plant extracts for their nematicidal efficacies against juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita. J Asia Pac Entomol 2008; 11: 99-102.
|||Devi LS, Gupta P. Evaluation of some plant lattices against Heterodera cajani in cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Natl Acad Sci Lett 2000; 23: 65-7.|
|||Yousif F, Hifnawy MS, Soliman G, et al. Large scale in vitro screening of Egyptian native and cultivated plants for schistosomicidal activity. Pharm Biol 2007; 45: 501-10.
|||Iqbal Z, Lateef M, Jabbar A, Muhammad G, Khan MN. Anthelmintic activity of Calotropis procera (Ait.) Ait. F. flowers in sheep. J Ethnopharmacol 2005; 102(2): 256-61.
|||Al-Qarawi AA, Mahmoud OM, Sobaih MA, Haroun EM, Adam SEI. A preliminary study on the anthelmintic activity of Calotropis procera latex against Haemonchus contortus infection in Najdi sheep. Vet Res Commun 2001; 25(1): 61-70.
|||Shivkar YM, Kumar VL. Antihelmintic effect of latex of Calotropis procera. Pharm Biol 2003; 41: 263-5.
|||Cavalcante GS, de Morais SM, Andre WPP, et al. Chemical composition and in vitro activity of Calotropis procera (Ait.) latex on Haemonchus contortus. Vet Parasitol 2016; 226: 22-5.
|||Lobo PPG, Llagas FD. Evaluation of starflower (Calotropis gigantea) against golden apple snail (Pomaceae canaliculata) in lowland transplanted rice. Philipp J Crop Sci 1991; 16: 103-7.|
|||Abo Zaid KH, El-Wakil H, El-Hussein A, Jomaa S, Shohayeb M. Evaluation of the molluscicidal activity of Punica granatum, Calotropis procera, Solanum incantum, and Citrullus colocynthis against Biomphalaria arabica. World Appl Sci J 2013; 26: 873-9.|
|||Usha K, Singh B, Praseetha P, et al. Antifungal activity of Datura stramonium, Calotropis gigantea, and Azadirachta indica against Fusarium mangiferae and floral malformation in mango. Eur J Plant Pathol 2009; 124: 637-57.
|||Abu-Taleb AM, El-Deeb K, Al-Otibi FO. Bioactivity of some plant extracts against Drechslera biseptata and Fusarium solani. J Food Agric Environ 2011; 9: 769-74.|
|||Shivpuri A, Sharma OP, Jhamaria SL. Fungitoxic properties of plant extracts against pathogenic fungi. J Mycol Plant Pathol 1997; 27: 29-31.|
|||Pathak N, Zaidi RK. Comparative study of seed dressing fungicides and Calotropis procera latex for the control of seed-borne mycoflora of wheat. Ann Biol Res 2013; 4: 1-6.|
|||Jabeen K, Waheed N, Iqbal S. Antifungal potential of Calotropis procera against Macrophomina phaseolina. Life Sci J 2013; 10: 572-6.|
|||Sadana D, Didwania N. Integrated disease management of bull eye’s pathogen infecting Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci 2019; 9: 53-7.
|||Abdel-Farid I, El-Sayed M, Mohamed E. Allelopathic potential of Calotropis procera and Morettia philaeana. Int J Agric Biol 2013; 15: 130-4.|
|||Qasem JR. A survey on the phytotoxicity of common weeds, wild grown species and medicinal plants on wheat. Allelopathy J 2017; 42: 179-93.
|||Kayode J. Allelopathic effect of aqueous extracts of Calotropis procera on germination and seedling growth of maize. Pak J Sci Ind Res 2004; 47: 69-72.|
|||Alshahrani NDSTS, Aref IM, Nasser RA. Allelopathic potential of Calotropis procera and Eucalyptus species on germination and growth of some timber trees. Allelopathy J 2017; 40: 81-94.
|||Raza A, Kamran M, Safdar ME, et al. Management tactics for the handling of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in non-native environment through phytotoxic compounds of local species. Int J Agric Biol 2019; 21: 215-22.|
|||Gulzar A, Siddiqui MB, Bi S. Phenolic acid allelochemicals induced morphological, ultrastructural, and cytological modification on Cassia sophera L. and Allium cepa L. Protoplasma 2016; 253(5): 1211-21.
|||Parsons WT, Cuthbertson EG. Noxious weeds of Australia 2001.|
|||Achakzai K, Khalid S, Adrees M, et al. Air pollution tolerance index of plants around brick kilns in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. J Environ Manage 2017; 190: 252-8.
|||Gajbhiye T, Pandey SK, Kim KH. Factors controlling the deposition of airborne metals on plant leaves in a subtropical industrial environment. Asian J Atmos Environ 2016; 10: 162-7.
|||Singh N, Yunus M, Srivastava K, et al. Monitoring of auto exhaust pollution by roadside plants. Environ Monit Assess 1995; 34(1): 13-25.
|||Khalid N, Hussain M, Young HS, Ashraf M, Hameed M, Ahmad R. Lead concentrations in soils and some wild plant species along two busy roads in Pakistan. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2018; 100(2): 250-8.
|||d’Souza R, Varun M, Pratas J, Paul MS. Spatial distribution of heavy metals in soil and flora associated with the glass industry in North Central India: implications for phytoremediation. Soil Sediment Contam 2013; 22: 1-20.
|||Kumar N, Bauddh K, Kumar S, Dwivedi N, Singh DP, Barman SC. Accumulation of metals in weed species grown on the soil contaminated with industrial wasteand their phytoremediation potential. Ecol Eng 2013; 61: 491-5.
|||Nawab J, Khan S, Shah MT, et al. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in native plants in chromite impacted sites: a search for effective remediating plant species, Clean – Soil, Air. Water 2016; 44: 37-46.|
|||Gupta AK, Sinha S. Phytoextraction capacity of the plants growing on tannery sludge dumping sites. Bioresour Technol 2007; 98(9): 1788-94.
|||Al-Qahtani KM. Assessment of heavy metals accumulation in native plant species from soils contaminated in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Life Sci J 2012; 2: 384-92.|
|||D’Souza RJ, Varun M, Masih J, Paul MS. Identification of Calotropis procera L. as a potential phytoaccumulator of heavy metals from contaminated soils in Urban North Central India. J Hazard Mater 2010; 184(1-3): 457-64.
|||Varun M, D’Souza R, Pratas J, Paul MS. Metal contamination of soils and plants associated with the glass industry in North Central India: prospects of phytoremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2012; 19(1): 269-81.
|||Singh M, Verma M, Kumar RN. Effects of open dumping of MSW on metal contamination of soil, plants, and earthworms in Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Environ Monit Assess 2018; 190(3): 139.
|||Chandra R, Kumar V, Tripathi S, Sharma P. Heavy metal phytoextraction potential of native weeds and greases from endocrine-disrupting chemicals rich complex distillery sludge and their histological observations during in-situ phytoremediation. Ecol Eng 2018; 111: 143-56.
|||Pandey PK, Verma Y, Choubey S, Pandey M, Chandrasekhar K. Biosorptive removal of cadmium from contaminated groundwater and industrial effluents. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99(10): 4420-7.
|||Barthwal J, Nair S, Kakkar P. Heavy metal accumulation in medicinal plants collected from environmentally different sites. Biomed Environ Sci 2008; 21(4): 319-24.
|||Tripathi A, Misra DR. Bioaccumalation of Pb, Ni and Zn in some plant species growing in and around a municipal waste dumpsite at Allahabad, India. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 2013; 39: 1-12.
|||Al-Farraj AS, Al-Wabel MI. Heavy metals accumulation of some plant species grown on mining area at Mahad AD’Dahab, Saudi Arabia. J Appl Sci (Faisalabad) 2007; 7: 1170-5.
|||Dan-Badjo AT, Ibrahim OZ, Guéro Y, Morel L, Feidt C, Echevarria G. Impacts of artisanal gold mining on soil, water and plant contamination by trace elements at Komabangou, Western Niger J Geochem Explor 2019; 205 ID 106328|
|||Khan ZI, Ahmad K, Rasheed MJZ, et al. Toxic and some essential metals in medicinal plants used in herbal medicines” a case study in Pakistan. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 2013; 7: 1389-95.
|||Taskeen A, Naeem I, Mubeen H, Moeen T. Comparison of Biomasses of Different Plants for Phytoremediation of Arsenic. Asian J Chem 2009; 21: 2857-60.|
|||Taskeen A, Naeem I. A comparative Study of Removal of Arsenic by Calotropis procera, Eichohornia crassipus and Pteris vitata Proceedings of International Seminar on Medicinal Plants, Lahore College for Women University 2008; 256-7.|
|||Mubeen H, Naeem I. Removal of Cu from Water and Waste Water using Calotropis procera roots, Proceedings of International Seminar on Medicinal Plants, Lahore College for Women University 2008; 245-250.|
|||Mubeen H, Naeem I, Taskeen A. Phytoremediation of Cu(II) by Calotropis procera roots. New York Sci J 2010; 3: 1-5.|
|||Okonko IO, Shittu OB. Bioremediation and municipal water treatment using latex exudate from Calotropis procera (Sodom apple). Electronic J Env Agr Food Chem 2007; 6: 1890-904.|
|||Vaishnav V, Chandra S, Daga K. Adsorption studies of Zn(II) ions from wastewater using Calotropis procera as an adsorbent. Int J Sci Eng Res 2011; 2: 1-6.|
|||Shittu BO, Popoola TOS, Taiwo O. Potentials of Calotropis procera leaves for wastewater treatment Proc Int Conf Sci Nat Develop 2004; 97-101.|
|||Babalola JO, Overah LC, Babarinde A, Oninla VO, Olatunde A. Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies on the biosorption of Cd (II) from aqueous solutions by the leaf biomass of Calotropis procera - ‘Sodom apple’. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 2011; 15: 607-15.|
|||Vaishnav V, Dega K, Lal M. Adsorption of metal (Cd) from synthetic wastewater by plant material. Int J Res Chem Environ 2013; 3: 148-54.|